Panthers vs Packers prediction

Carolina Panthers at Green Bay Packers, Thursday, October 29, 2026 · Lambeau Field. We simulated this game 10,000 times before kickoff, every snap drawn from real play-by-play data for this matchup. Most plausible outcome: Packers 24, Panthers 23.

Final: GB 27–19. Before the game the most plausible outcome was Packers 24, Panthers 23 (the Packers won 55% of the simulations). The simulations' favorite won.

Most plausible outcome

Carolina Panthers23
Green Bay Packers24

The likeliest final of 10,000 simulated games: the Packers won 55% of them, and this is the result closest to both teams' middle scores.

Top performers

How it played out: scoring plays

  1. 1stGB Love to Jacobs, 4-yd TD 0–7
  2. 2ndCAR 31-yd field goal 3–7
  3. 2ndCAR Young to Coker, 7-yd TD 10–7
  4. 2ndGB Lloyd 2-yd TD run 10–14
  5. 3rdCAR 33-yd field goal 13–14
  6. 4thCAR 25-yd field goal 16–14
  7. 4thGB 31-yd field goal 16–17
  8. 4thCAR Young to Hubbard, 2-yd TD 23–17
  9. 4thGB Williams 6-yd TD run 23–24

Box score

Panthers passing
PlayerC/ATTYDSTDINTSK
Bryce Young25/38285220
Panthers rushing
PlayerCARYDSTD
Chuba Hubbard18810
Bryce Young2140
Trevor Etienne270
Mitchell Evans1-10
Anthony Tyus III1-10
Panthers receiving
PlayerRECTGTYDSTDLNG
Tetairoa McMillan5971028
Darren Waller4566031
Chuba Hubbard2440138
Jalen Coker5739111
Mitchell Evans3528011
Tommy Tremble3423012
David Moore1113013
Brycen Tremayne22503
Packers passing
PlayerC/ATTYDSTDINTSK
Jordan Love23/35281101
Packers rushing
PlayerCARYDSTD
Josh Jacobs12490
Jordan Love4120
Savion Williams4101
Pierre Strong270
MarShawn Lloyd641
Tucker Kraft130
Packers receiving
PlayerRECTGTYDSTDLNG
Matthew Golden41086045
Christian Watson5981036
Savion Williams2240039
Tucker Kraft553608
Josh Jacobs3325120
MarShawn Lloyd12808
Bo Melton12606
Pierre Strong22-100

The breakdown

  1. Who's in the sim

    Panthers: QB Young · McMillan 25% of targets · Coker 23% of targets · Tremble 10% of targets · Hubbard 84% of carries

    Packers: QB Love · Golden 26% of targets · Watson 22% of targets · Kraft 17% of targets · Jacobs 51% of carries. Back: Jacobs (missed 6 of 7). Out: Kaleb Johnson

  2. What's mapped in

    • Who is actually playing: this week's starting QB, the injury report, and each player's share in the games he played, so a starter back from injury gets his role back.
    • Each receiver's own target depth and yards after the catch, against this defense's completions, depth and tackling allowed.
    • Each QB's real scramble rate and his blitz splits, against how often this defense blitzes and lets quarterbacks escape.
    • Each runner's lanes (left, middle, right) and what he gets in each, against this defense side by side; the box count he usually sees.
    • Play action, red-zone and goal-line shares, QB sneaks, each coach's 4th-down habit, penalties, kicks, weather and the clock.
    • Game plans that swing like real ones, and a small chance a starter leaves early, so a backup or role player can have his night.
  3. What decides it

    The pass rush. Packers take a sack on 6% of dropbacks (6th-fewest). Panthers get home on 6% (8th-fewest), blitzing on 32% of dropbacks.

    Through the air. Packers complete −0.4 pts more passes than expected (18th of 32). Panthers allow −1.3 pts vs expected (6th-least generous).

    Young vs the blitz: 5.7 yards a dropback (league 6.1). Packers blitz on 29% of dropbacks (19th of 32).

    Young's pocket: gets the ball out in 2.87 seconds on average, scrambles on 4.6% of dropbacks (league 5.7%).

    Hubbard to the left: 5.1 yards a carry there (41% of his runs), and Packers give up +0.2 yards a carry on that side.

    McMillan draws 25% of the Panthers targets and averages 2.7 yards of separation when the ball arrives.

    Love vs the blitz: 6.9 yards a dropback (league 6.1). Panthers blitz on 32% of dropbacks (12th of 32).

    Love's pocket: gets the ball out in 2.72 seconds on average, scrambles on 2.9% of dropbacks (league 5.7%).

    Jacobs to the right: 3.5 yards a carry there (36% of his runs), and Panthers give up −0.0 yards a carry on that side.

    Golden draws 26% of the Packers targets and averages 2.6 yards of separation when the ball arrives.

  4. Things you'll notice in the sim

    McMillan leads the Panthers in receiving yards in 43% of sims.

    Young throws for 300+ in 15%.

    Hubbard runs for 100+ in 32%.

    Hubbard scores a touchdown in 59%, the likeliest on his team.

    Watson leads the Packers in receiving yards in 36% of sims.

    Love throws for 300+ in 20%.

    Jacobs runs for 100+ in 11%.

    Jacobs scores a touchdown in 47%, the likeliest on his team.

  5. What swings it

    When Hubbard runs for 110+ (26% of sims), they win 80%, up from 44%.

    When Panthers run for 130+ yards (32% of sims), they win 77%, up from 44%.

    When Packers run for 140+ yards (29% of sims), they win 88%, up from 55%.

  6. Reality check

    Panthers score 26.5 a game (last 6). In the sims: 21.6 against this defense.

    Packers score 20.6 a game (last 7). In the sims: 23.6 against this defense.

    Young: 254 pass yds a game (last 8). In the sims: 230.

    McMillan: 5.1 catches, 75 yds a game (last 8). In the sims: 5, 62.

    Hubbard: 60.1 rush yds a game (last 8). In the sims: 84.

    Love: 279.7 pass yds a game (last 7). In the sims: 239.

    Watson: 4.9 catches, 85 yds a game (last 7). In the sims: 4, 64.

    Jacobs: 36 rush yds a game (last 1). In the sims: 54.

  7. The 10,000 vs the market

    The Packers win 55% of the 10,000 games.

    Against the spread (GB −3.5): the Packers cover in 47%.

    Total 47.5: over in 42%.

    The sims are not built to beat the spread: on past games the side they favored covered about half the time.

  8. Props: the sims vs the price

    • MarShawn Lloyd25+ rush yds
      54%of sims
      35%books imply
    • Josh Jacobs25+ rec yds
      51%of sims
      41%books imply
    • Chuba Hubbardanytime TD
      59%of sims
      52%books imply
    • Josh Jacobs3+ catches
      66%of sims
      59%books imply

This week's simulations

How it works

Every snap uses real plays from the same down, distance and field position, adjusted for this offense against this defense, with weather, penalties, turnovers, kicks and the clock. Methodology

Research, not advice

The most plausible outcome is the likeliest single result of the simulations; it is not a prediction or a guarantee. 21+. Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER.