Colts vs Jaguars prediction

Indianapolis Colts at Jacksonville Jaguars, Sunday, November 1, 2026 · EverBank Stadium. We simulated this game 10,000 times before kickoff, every snap drawn from real play-by-play data for this matchup. Most plausible outcome: Jaguars 26, Colts 16.

Final: JAX 42–7. Before the game the most plausible outcome was Jaguars 26, Colts 16 (the Jaguars won 72% of the simulations). The simulations' favorite won.

Most plausible outcome

Indianapolis Colts16
Jacksonville Jaguars26

The likeliest final of 10,000 simulated games: the Jaguars won 72% of them, and this is the result closest to both teams' middle scores.

Top performers

How it played out: scoring plays

  1. 1stIND Taylor 14-yd TD run 6–0
  2. 1stIND 36-yd field goal 9–0
  3. 2ndIND Jones to Downs, 18-yd TD 16–0
  4. 2ndJAX 41-yd field goal 16–3
  5. 2ndJAX 45-yd field goal 16–6
  6. 3rdJAX Lawrence to Abdullah, 15-yd TD 16–13
  7. 3rdJAX 29-yd field goal 16–16
  8. 4thJAX Lawrence to Strange, 8-yd TD 16–23
  9. 4thJAX 64-yd field goal 16–26

Box score

Colts passing
PlayerC/ATTYDSTDINTSK
Daniel Jones16/33153121
Colts rushing
PlayerCARYDSTD
Jonathan Taylor22931
Seth McGowan5100
Daniel Jones110
Colts receiving
PlayerRECTGTYDSTDLNG
Jonathan Taylor4437013
Keenan Allen4630012
Josh Downs2729118
Laquon Treadwell2522015
Tyler Warren1213013
Deion Burks1313013
Seth McGowan12707
Will Mallory12202
Jaguars passing
PlayerC/ATTYDSTDINTSK
Trevor Lawrence20/38279202
Jaguars rushing
PlayerCARYDSTD
Chris Rodriguez Jr.8660
Bhayshul Tuten16380
Ameer Abdullah240
Trevor Lawrence120
Jaguars receiving
PlayerRECTGTYDSTDLNG
Parker Washington59114042
Jakobi Meyers4649022
Brenton Strange4739113
Josh Cameron2329018
Bhayshul Tuten2326016
Ameer Abdullah2215115
Nate Boerkircher15707
Brian Thomas Jr.01000

The breakdown

  1. The setup

    Wind: 13 mph forecast, which trims the deep passing and long kicks.

    Colts use play action on 27% of dropbacks (5th-most).

  2. Who's in the sim

    Colts: QB Jones · Warren 20% of targets · Allen 20% of targets · Downs 18% of targets · Taylor 65% of carries. Back: Warren (missed 2 of 7)

    Jaguars: QB Lawrence · Washington 22% of targets · Meyers 17% of targets · Strange 16% of targets · Tuten 53% of carries

  3. What's mapped in

    • Who is actually playing: this week's starting QB, the injury report, and each player's share in the games he played, so a starter back from injury gets his role back.
    • Each receiver's own target depth and yards after the catch, against this defense's completions, depth and tackling allowed.
    • Each QB's real scramble rate and his blitz splits, against how often this defense blitzes and lets quarterbacks escape.
    • Each runner's lanes (left, middle, right) and what he gets in each, against this defense side by side; the box count he usually sees.
    • Play action, red-zone and goal-line shares, QB sneaks, each coach's 4th-down habit, penalties, kicks, weather and the clock.
    • Game plans that swing like real ones, and a small chance a starter leaves early, so a backup or role player can have his night.
  4. What decides it

    Takeaways. Colts throw an interception on 3% of passes (4th-most). Jaguars pick off 3% (the most).

    After the catch. Jaguars gain +0.1 yards after the catch vs expected (8th-best). Colts allow +0.1 (6th-worst tackling).

    The pass rush. Colts take a sack on 6% of dropbacks (16th of 32). Jaguars get home on 6% (2nd-fewest), blitzing on 31% of dropbacks.

    Jones vs the blitz: 5.4 yards a dropback (league 6.1). Jaguars blitz on 31% of dropbacks (14th of 32).

    Jones's pocket: gets the ball out in 2.78 seconds on average, scrambles on 4.4% of dropbacks (league 5.7%).

    Taylor to the left: 4.2 yards a carry there (34% of his runs), and Jaguars give up +0.1 yards a carry on that side.

    Warren draws 20% of the Colts targets and averages 3.5 yards of separation when the ball arrives.

    Lawrence vs the blitz: 7.1 yards a dropback (league 6.1). Colts blitz on 28% of dropbacks (9th-fewest).

    Lawrence's pocket: gets the ball out in 2.79 seconds on average, scrambles on 5.5% of dropbacks (league 5.7%).

    Tuten to the left: 4.2 yards a carry there (38% of his runs), and Colts give up +0.5 yards a carry on that side.

    Washington draws 22% of the Jaguars targets and averages 2.3 yards of separation when the ball arrives.

  5. Things you'll notice in the sim

    Warren leads the Colts in receiving yards in 31% of sims.

    Jones throws for 300+ in 8%.

    Taylor runs for 100+ in 16%.

    Taylor scores a touchdown in 41%, the likeliest on his team.

    Washington leads the Jaguars in receiving yards in 40% of sims.

    Lawrence throws for 300+ in 22%.

    Tuten runs for 100+ in 18%.

    Tuten scores a touchdown in 45%, the likeliest on his team.

  6. What swings it

    When Colts run for 120+ yards (28% of sims), they win 61%, up from 27%.

    When Taylor runs for 80+ (27% of sims), they win 58%, up from 27%.

    When Jaguars run for 160+ yards (28% of sims), they win 95%, up from 72%.

  7. Reality check

    Colts score 22 a game (last 7). In the sims: 17.7 against this defense.

    Jaguars score 25.7 a game (last 6). In the sims: 26 against this defense.

    Jones: 199.7 pass yds a game (last 7). In the sims: 205.

    Downs: 3.8 catches, 44.5 yds a game (last 8). In the sims: 3.6, 36.

    Taylor: 76.6 rush yds a game (last 8). In the sims: 61.

    Lawrence: 249.8 pass yds a game (last 8). In the sims: 245.

    Washington: 4.9 catches, 77.2 yds a game (last 8). In the sims: 4, 61.

    Tuten: 58.7 rush yds a game (last 7). In the sims: 66.

  8. The 10,000 vs the market

    The Jaguars win 72% of the 10,000 games.

    Against the spread (JAX −10): the Jaguars cover in 44%.

    Total 45.5: over in 43%.

    The sims are not built to beat the spread: on past games the side they favored covered about half the time.

This week's simulations

How it works

Every snap uses real plays from the same down, distance and field position, adjusted for this offense against this defense, with weather, penalties, turnovers, kicks and the clock. Methodology

Research, not advice

The most plausible outcome is the likeliest single result of the simulations; it is not a prediction or a guarantee. 21+. Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER.