Chargers vs Rams prediction

Los Angeles Chargers at Los Angeles Rams, Sunday, November 1, 2026 · SoFi Stadium. We simulated this game 10,000 times before kickoff, every snap drawn from real play-by-play data for this matchup. Most plausible outcome: Rams 33, Chargers 17.

Final: LA 24–9. Before the game the most plausible outcome was Rams 33, Chargers 17 (the Rams won 76% of the simulations). The simulations' favorite won.

Most plausible outcome

Los Angeles Chargers17
Los Angeles Rams33

The likeliest final of 10,000 simulated games: the Rams won 76% of them, and this is the result closest to both teams' middle scores.

Top performers

How it played out: scoring plays

  1. 1stLA Williams 40-yd TD run 0–7
  2. 1stLA Turnover returned for a TD 0–14
  3. 1stLAC 29-yd field goal 3–14
  4. 2ndLA 56-yd field goal 3–17
  5. 2ndLA Stafford to Nacua, 21-yd TD 3–24
  6. 2ndLA 38-yd field goal 10–27
  7. 4thLA 25-yd field goal 10–30
  8. 4thLAC Herbert to Lambert-Smith, 6-yd TD 17–30
  9. 4thLA 40-yd field goal 17–33

Box score

Chargers passing
PlayerC/ATTYDSTDINTSK
Justin Herbert22/33211123
Chargers rushing
PlayerCARYDSTD
Omarion Hampton9500
Kimani Vidal4410
Justin Herbert3390
Keaton Mitchell6330
Chargers receiving
PlayerRECTGTYDSTDLNG
Tre Harris3644019
Omarion Hampton5534014
Oronde Gadsden II3526014
Ladd McConkey2522013
Quentin Johnston2320012
Keaton Mitchell2220011
Derius Davis1119019
Kimani Vidal2316012
KeAndre Lambert-Smith231016
Rams passing
PlayerC/ATTYDSTDINTSK
Matthew Stafford17/29206102
Rams rushing
PlayerCARYDSTD
Kyren Williams191231
Blake Corum9390
Puka Nacua360
Matthew Stafford110
Rams receiving
PlayerRECTGTYDSTDLNG
Puka Nacua4975130
Tyler Higbee3360023
Colby Parkinson5732015
Kyren Williams3422012
Davis Allen2317012
Konata Mumpfield02000

The breakdown

  1. The setup

    Rams use play action on 28% of dropbacks (2nd-most).

  2. Who's in the sim

    Chargers: QB Herbert · Gadsden 17% of targets · Johnston 14% of targets · McConkey 13% of targets · Hampton 42% of carries

    Rams: QB Stafford · Nacua 31% of targets · Williams 15% of targets · Parkinson 14% of targets · Williams 54% of carries. Back: Nacua (missed 2 of 7). Out: Davante Adams

  3. What's mapped in

    • Who is actually playing: this week's starting QB, the injury report, and each player's share in the games he played, so a starter back from injury gets his role back.
    • Each receiver's own target depth and yards after the catch, against this defense's completions, depth and tackling allowed.
    • Each QB's real scramble rate and his blitz splits, against how often this defense blitzes and lets quarterbacks escape.
    • Each runner's lanes (left, middle, right) and what he gets in each, against this defense side by side; the box count he usually sees.
    • Play action, red-zone and goal-line shares, QB sneaks, each coach's 4th-down habit, penalties, kicks, weather and the clock.
    • Game plans that swing like real ones, and a small chance a starter leaves early, so a backup or role player can have his night.
  4. What decides it

    Through the air. Chargers complete −1.4 pts more passes than expected (7th-worst). Rams allow −2.8 pts vs expected (3rd-least generous).

    Takeaways. Chargers throw an interception on 3% of passes (the most). Rams pick off 2% (10th-most).

    On the ground. Rams average 4.8 yards a carry (the best). Chargers allow 4.2 (15th of 32).

    Herbert vs the blitz: 6.0 yards a dropback (league 6.1). Rams blitz on 28% of dropbacks (21st of 32).

    Herbert's pocket: gets the ball out in 2.87 seconds on average, scrambles on 8.4% of dropbacks (league 5.7%).

    Hampton to the right: 4.1 yards a carry there (31% of his runs), and Rams give up +0.2 yards a carry on that side.

    Johnston draws 14% of the Chargers targets and averages 2.7 yards of separation when the ball arrives.

    Stafford vs the blitz: 6.8 yards a dropback (league 6.1). Chargers blitz on 27% of dropbacks (6th-fewest).

    Stafford's pocket: gets the ball out in 2.78 seconds on average, scrambles on 2.2% of dropbacks (league 5.7%).

    Williams to the left: 5.0 yards a carry there (29% of his runs), and Chargers give up +0.3 yards a carry on that side.

    Nacua draws 31% of the Rams targets and averages 2.8 yards of separation when the ball arrives.

  5. Things you'll notice in the sim

    Gadsden leads the Chargers in receiving yards in 25% of sims.

    Herbert throws for 300+ in 8%.

    Hampton runs for 100+ in 5%.

    Gadsden scores a touchdown in 33%, the likeliest on his team.

    Nacua leads the Rams in receiving yards in 74% of sims.

    Stafford throws for 300+ in 30%.

    Williams runs for 100+ in 25%.

    Nacua scores a touchdown in 61%, the likeliest on his team.

  6. What swings it

    When Chargers run for 120+ yards (33% of sims), they win 48%, up from 22%.

    When Hampton runs for 60+ (20% of sims), they win 51%, up from 22%.

    When Rams run for 170+ yards (30% of sims), they win 98%, up from 76%.

  7. Reality check

    Chargers score 15 a game (last 6). In the sims: 18.4 against this defense.

    Rams score 24.3 a game (last 7). In the sims: 29.4 against this defense.

    Herbert: 196.7 pass yds a game (last 7). In the sims: 202.

    Johnston: 2.2 catches, 43.8 yds a game (last 6). In the sims: 2.4, 31.

    Hampton: 45.4 rush yds a game (last 7). In the sims: 39.

    Stafford: 281 pass yds a game (last 8). In the sims: 263.

    Nacua: 9.2 catches, 93.5 yds a game (last 6). In the sims: 7.8, 102.

    Williams: 69 rush yds a game (last 8). In the sims: 75.

  8. The 10,000 vs the market

    The Rams win 76% of the 10,000 games.

    Against the spread (LA −6.5): the Rams cover in 62%.

    Total 46.5: over in 54%.

    The sims are not built to beat the spread: on past games the side they favored covered about half the time.

This week's simulations

How it works

Every snap uses real plays from the same down, distance and field position, adjusted for this offense against this defense, with weather, penalties, turnovers, kicks and the clock. Methodology

Research, not advice

The most plausible outcome is the likeliest single result of the simulations; it is not a prediction or a guarantee. 21+. Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER.